2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2011 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2011 Fisker Karma is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1000 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 2011 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Fisker |
| Model | Camaro | Karma |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 36 L |
