2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2011 Ford F-250
To start off, 2011 Ford F-250 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-250 (548 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. (454 Nm). This means 2011 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. 2011 Ford F-250 has automatic transmission and 2000 Chevrolet Camaro has manual transmission. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Ford F-250 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 2011 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Camaro | F-250 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5670 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 385 HP |
Torque | 454 Nm | 548 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1966 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3967 mm |