2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2011 Volkswagen T5
To start off, 2011 Volkswagen T5 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volkswagen T5 weights approximately 767 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2011 Volkswagen T5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volkswagen T5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (468 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Volkswagen T5. (400 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Volkswagen T5.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 2011 Volkswagen T5 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volkswagen |
Model | Camaro | T5 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5670 cc | 2459 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 172 HP |
Torque | 468 Nm | 400 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 2307 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 80 L |