2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2013 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2013 Lotus Evora is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lotus Evora weights approximately 252 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (454 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Lotus Evora. (400 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Lotus Evora.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 2013 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
Model | Camaro | Evora |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 345 HP |
Torque | 454 Nm | 400 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1188 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4361 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2047 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1229 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2575 mm |