2000 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro (926 Nm) has 796 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (130 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Smart |
| Model | Camaro | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Type | V | electric |
| Horse Power | 770 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 926 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1559 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 1867 mm |
