2000 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1963 Ferrari 156
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ferrari 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ferrari 156 would be higher. At 2,190 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ferrari 156 (187 HP @ 9500 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier. (120 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ferrari 156 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier weights approximately 753 kg more than 1963 Ferrari 156.
Because 1963 Ferrari 156 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ferrari 156. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Cavalier | 1963 Ferrari 156 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ferrari |
Model | Cavalier | 156 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2190 cc | 1486 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 9500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1215 kg | 462 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1010 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2330 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 119 L |