2000 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1968 DAF 44
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 DAF 44. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 DAF 44 would be higher. At 2,190 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier (120 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1968 DAF 44. (34 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier should accelerate faster than 1968 DAF 44. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier weights approximately 432 kg more than 1968 DAF 44. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier (176 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 DAF 44. (65 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 DAF 44.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier | 1968 DAF 44 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DAF |
| Model | Cavalier | 44 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2190 cc | 844 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 65 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 755 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2260 mm |
