2000 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 132 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Cavalier | 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
Model | Cavalier | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2190 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1194 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2680 mm |