2000 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 1993 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,190 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier (120 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1993 Mazda 626. (110 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier should accelerate faster than 1993 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Mazda 626 weights approximately 26 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier (183 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Mazda 626. (168 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Cavalier | 1993 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Cavalier | 626 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1993 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2190 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 168 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 98 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1194 kg | 1220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2620 mm |