2000 Chevrolet Cavalier vs. 2012 Tata Nano
To start off, 2012 Tata Nano is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier would be higher. At 2,190 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier (120 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2012 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier should accelerate faster than 2012 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier weights approximately 594 kg more than 2012 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier (183 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Cavalier | 2012 Tata Nano | |
Make | Chevrolet | Tata |
Model | Cavalier | Nano |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2190 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1194 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 37 L |