2000 Chevrolet Celta vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Celta is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Celta | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Celta | Challenger |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1780 mm |