2000 Chevrolet Express vs. 1966 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Express is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 683 kg more than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Express is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Express. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Suzuki Fronte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Express (408 Nm) has 376 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Express | 1966 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
| Model | Express | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 5300 cc | 360 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 18 HP |
| Torque | 408 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 504 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6210 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2090 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3940 mm | 2060 mm |
