2000 Chevrolet Express vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Express. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Express would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 591 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Express.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Express (408 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Cadillac CTS. (373 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Express | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Chevrolet | Cadillac |
Model | Express | CTS |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5300 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 314 HP |
Torque | 408 Nm | 373 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 15 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1778 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6210 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2090 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3940 mm | 2880 mm |