2000 Chevrolet Express vs. 2013 Chrysler 200
To start off, 2013 Chrysler 200 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Express. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Express would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chrysler 200 weights approximately 435 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Express.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Express is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet Express. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chrysler 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Express (408 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Chrysler 200. (353 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Express will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Chrysler 200.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Express | 2013 Chrysler 200 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
Model | Express | 200 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5300 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 279 HP |
Torque | 408 Nm | 353 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 15 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1622 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6210 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2121 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2090 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3940 mm | 2765 mm |