2000 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel

To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Malibu (168 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (64 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1969 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 470 kg more than 1969 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Malibu (257 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (96 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Riley Kestrel.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chevrolet Malibu 1969 Riley Kestrel
Make Chevrolet Riley
Model Malibu Kestrel
Year Released 2000 1969
Engine Size 3135 cc 1275 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 168 HP 64 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5750 RPM
Torque 257 Nm 96 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 1380 kg 910 kg
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 3730 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1540 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 2380 mm