2000 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1972 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Malibu (168 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1972 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 135 kg more than 1972 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Malibu (257 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Malibu | 1972 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
Model | Malibu | 2000 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3135 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2700 mm |