2000 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1973 Honda 1300
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Honda 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Honda 1300 would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Malibu (168 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1973 Honda 1300. (81 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1973 Honda 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 485 kg more than 1973 Honda 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Malibu (257 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Honda 1300. (105 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Honda 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Malibu | 1973 Honda 1300 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Malibu | 1300 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3135 cc | 1298 cc |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 895 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2200 mm |