2000 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1983 Mercury Lynx

To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Malibu (168 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1983 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 426 kg more than 1983 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Malibu (257 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mercury Lynx.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chevrolet Malibu 1983 Mercury Lynx
Make Chevrolet Mercury
Model Malibu Lynx
Year Released 2000 1983
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3135 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 168 HP 70 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 257 Nm 121 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 1380 kg 954 kg
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 4170 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1680 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 2400 mm