2000 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2003 Citroen C3

To start off, 2003 Citroen C3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Malibu (168 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2003 Citroen C3. (108 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 2003 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 1 kg more than 2003 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Malibu (257 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Citroen C3. (111 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Citroen C3.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chevrolet Malibu 2003 Citroen C3
Make Chevrolet Citroen
Model Malibu C3
Year Released 2000 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3135 cc 1587 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 168 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5750 RPM
Torque 257 Nm 111 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1380 kg 1379 kg
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 3860 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1670 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1540 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 2470 mm