2000 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2005 Ford Maverick
To start off, 2005 Ford Maverick is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Malibu (168 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2005 Ford Maverick. (114 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Maverick. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Maverick weights approximately 135 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 2005 Ford Maverick is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chevrolet Malibu. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Maverick will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Malibu (257 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Maverick. (160 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Maverick.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Malibu | 2005 Ford Maverick | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Malibu | Maverick |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3135 cc | 2699 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 257 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1515 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2490 mm |
