2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1953 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 3,783 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1953 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 1953 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Talbot Baby weights approximately 116 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Because 1953 Talbot Baby is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Talbot Baby. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1953 Talbot Baby | |
Make | Chevrolet | Talbot |
Model | Monte Carlo | Baby |
Year Released | 2000 | 1953 |
Engine Size | 3783 cc | 2690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1656 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3130 mm |