2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1974 Nissan 240 C
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 3,783 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 280 kg more than 1974 Nissan 240 C.
Because 1974 Nissan 240 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Nissan 240 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo has automatic transmission and 1974 Nissan 240 C has manual transmission. 1974 Nissan 240 C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1974 Nissan 240 C | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
| Model | Monte Carlo | 240 C |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3783 cc | 1982 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1260 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2700 mm |
