2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 1995 Chrysler Cirrus
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Chrysler Cirrus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Chrysler Cirrus would be higher. At 3,783 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1995 Chrysler Cirrus. (164 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 1995 Chrysler Cirrus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo weights approximately 213 kg more than 1995 Chrysler Cirrus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (305 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Chrysler Cirrus. (221 Nm @ 4350 RPM). This means 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Chrysler Cirrus.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 1995 Chrysler Cirrus | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
| Model | Monte Carlo | Cirrus |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3783 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 164 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4350 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96.5 mm | 83.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1327 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |
