2000 Chevrolet Prizm vs. 2003 MG ZT

To start off, 2003 MG ZT is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Prizm. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Prizm would be higher. At 1,951 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MG ZT (129 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Prizm. (123 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MG ZT should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Prizm. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT weights approximately 395 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Prizm. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZT (300 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Prizm. (170 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Prizm.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chevrolet Prizm 2003 MG ZT
Make Chevrolet MG
Model Prizm ZT
Year Released 2000 2003
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1794 cc 1951 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 123 HP 129 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 170 Nm 300 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 1900 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1090 kg 1485 kg
Vehicle Length 4430 mm 4760 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2470 mm 2760 mm