2000 Chevrolet S-10 vs. 1979 Volvo 164
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet S-10 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Volvo 164 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet S-10. (119 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet S-10.
Because 2000 Chevrolet S-10 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Volvo 164. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet S-10 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Volvo 164 (205 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet S-10. (190 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1979 Volvo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet S-10.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet S-10 | 1979 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | S-10 | 164 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1979 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 205 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 5610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 3350 mm |