2000 Chevrolet S-10 vs. 2009 Ford Transit Connect
To start off, 2009 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet S-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet S-10 would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet S-10 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Chevrolet S-10 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Transit Connect. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet S-10 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Ford Transit Connect has automatic transmission and 2000 Chevrolet S-10 has manual transmission. 2000 Chevrolet S-10 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford Transit Connect will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet S-10 | 2009 Ford Transit Connect | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | S-10 | Transit Connect |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Panel Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2196 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1820 mm |
