2000 Chevrolet S-10 vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet S-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet S-10 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 241 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet S-10. (119 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet S-10.
Because 2000 Chevrolet S-10 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet S-10 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet S-10. (190 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet S-10.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet S-10 | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | S-10 | Commodore |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2196 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |