2000 Chevrolet Silverado vs. 1997 Ford Puma
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Silverado is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Puma would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Silverado is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Silverado weights approximately 177 kg more than 1997 Ford Puma.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Silverado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Ford Puma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Silverado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet Silverado (386 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Ford Puma. (126 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet Silverado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Silverado | 1997 Ford Puma | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Silverado | Puma |
Year Released | 2000 | 1997 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5733 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 386 Nm | 126 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1187 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 42 L |