2000 Chevrolet SSR vs. 1953 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 5,324 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet SSR (300 HP) has 263 more horse power than 1953 Ford 12 M. (37 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet SSR has automatic transmission and 1953 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1953 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet SSR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet SSR | 1953 Ford 12 M | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | SSR | 12 M |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5324 cc | 1171 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 37 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2500 mm |
