2000 Chevrolet SSR vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 5,324 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet SSR (300 HP) has 257 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 1040 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chevrolet SSR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet SSR | 1963 DKW Munga | |
Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
Model | SSR | Munga |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5324 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 43 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2150 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2010 mm |