2000 Chevrolet SSR vs. 1964 Isuzu Minx

To start off, 2000 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 5,324 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet SSR (300 HP) has 238 more horse power than 1964 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1964 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 1120 kg more than 1964 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet SSR (481 Nm) has 369 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Isuzu Minx. 2000 Chevrolet SSR has automatic transmission and 1964 Isuzu Minx has manual transmission. 1964 Isuzu Minx will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet SSR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chevrolet SSR 1964 Isuzu Minx
Make Chevrolet Isuzu
Model SSR Minx
Year Released 2000 1964
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5324 cc 1491 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 300 HP 62 HP
Torque 481 Nm 112 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 9.3:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Vehicle Weight 2150 kg 1030 kg
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 4120 mm
Vehicle Width 2000 mm 1550 mm
Vehicle Height 1640 mm 1520 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2440 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]