2000 Chevrolet SSR vs. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet SSR (300 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. (275 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 480 kg more than 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet SSR | 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
| Model | SSR | Caprice |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5324 cc | 6476 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 275 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2150 kg | 1670 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3030 mm |
