2000 Chevrolet SSR vs. 1965 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 5,324 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet SSR (300 HP) has 92 more horse power than 1965 Ford Mustang. (208 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1965 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 985 kg more than 1965 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet SSR | 1965 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | SSR | Mustang |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5324 cc | 4733 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 208 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2150 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2750 mm |