2000 Chevrolet SSR vs. 1965 Toyota Crown
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 5,324 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet SSR (300 HP) has 220 more horse power than 1965 Toyota Crown. (80 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1965 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 895 kg more than 1965 Toyota Crown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet SSR (481 Nm) has 335 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Toyota Crown. (146 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet SSR | 1965 Toyota Crown | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | SSR | Crown |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5324 cc | 1897 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 80 HP |
| Torque | 481 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2150 kg | 1255 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2700 mm |
