2000 Chevrolet SSR vs. 1966 Mercury Comet
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 5,324 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet SSR (300 HP) has 102 more horse power than 1966 Mercury Comet. (198 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1966 Mercury Comet.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet SSR (481 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Mercury Comet. (382 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Mercury Comet.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet SSR | 1966 Mercury Comet | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
Model | SSR | Comet |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5324 cc | 4738 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 198 HP |
Torque | 481 Nm | 382 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2950 mm |