2000 Chevrolet SSR vs. 1978 Chrysler 160
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 5,324 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet SSR (300 HP) has 211 more horse power than 1978 Chrysler 160. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1978 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 1065 kg more than 1978 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet SSR (481 Nm) has 348 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Chrysler 160. (133 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet SSR | 1978 Chrysler 160 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
Model | SSR | 160 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5324 cc | 1639 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 481 Nm | 133 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2150 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2680 mm |