2000 Chevrolet SSR vs. 1980 Mazda 323
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 5,324 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 1340 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet SSR has automatic transmission and 1980 Mazda 323 has manual transmission. 1980 Mazda 323 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet SSR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet SSR | 1980 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | SSR | 323 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5324 cc | 985 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2150 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2320 mm |
