2000 Chevrolet SSR vs. 1986 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 5,324 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 1046 kg more than 1986 Toyota Lite Ace.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet SSR has automatic transmission and 1986 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1986 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet SSR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet SSR | 1986 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | SSR | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
Engine Size | 5324 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2150 kg | 1104 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1910 mm |