2000 Chevrolet SSR vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 5,324 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 320 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet SSR | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | SSR | Challenger |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5324 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 0 HP |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2150 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2730 mm |