2000 Chevrolet SSR vs. 1998 Ford Falcon

To start off, 2000 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 5,324 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet SSR (300 HP) has 79 more horse power than 1998 Ford Falcon. (221 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1998 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 635 kg more than 1998 Ford Falcon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet SSR (481 Nm) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Ford Falcon. (357 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Ford Falcon.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chevrolet SSR 1998 Ford Falcon
Make Chevrolet Ford
Model SSR Falcon
Year Released 2000 1998
Body Type Pickup Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5324 cc 3984 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 300 HP 221 HP
Torque 481 Nm 357 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 2150 kg 1515 kg
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 4910 mm
Vehicle Width 2000 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1640 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2800 mm