2000 Chevrolet SSR vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 7,275 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet SSR (300 HP) has 87 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (213 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 295 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet SSR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (575 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet SSR. (481 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet SSR.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet SSR | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | SSR | Econoline |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5324 cc | 7275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 213 HP |
| Torque | 481 Nm | 575 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2150 kg | 2445 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3510 mm |
