2000 Chevrolet SSR vs. 2004 Ford F-250
To start off, 2004 Ford F-250 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet SSR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet SSR would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet SSR (300 HP) has 40 more horse power than 2004 Ford F-250. (260 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford F-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford F-250 weights approximately 789 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet SSR.
Because 2004 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chevrolet SSR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet SSR (481 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford F-250. (476 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford F-250.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet SSR | 2004 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | SSR | F-250 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5324 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 260 HP |
Torque | 481 Nm | 476 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2150 kg | 2939 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 6250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3970 mm |