2000 Chevrolet SSR vs. 2004 Renault Clio

To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet SSR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet SSR would be higher. At 5,324 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet SSR (300 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2004 Renault Clio. (251 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 734 kg more than 2004 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet SSR (481 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Clio. (300 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Clio. 2000 Chevrolet SSR has automatic transmission and 2004 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2004 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet SSR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chevrolet SSR 2004 Renault Clio
Make Chevrolet Renault
Model SSR Clio
Year Released 2000 2004
Body Type Pickup Hatchback
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 5324 cc 2946 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 300 HP 251 HP
Torque 481 Nm 300 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 11.4:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 2150 kg 1416 kg
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 3850 mm
Vehicle Width 2000 mm 1950 mm
Vehicle Height 1640 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2480 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]