2000 Chevrolet SSR vs. 2006 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2006 Jaguar XJ is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet SSR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet SSR would be higher. At 5,324 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Jaguar XJ (400 HP) has 100 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet SSR. (300 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet SSR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 530 kg more than 2006 Jaguar XJ.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jaguar XJ (561 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet SSR. (481 Nm). This means 2006 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet SSR.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet SSR | 2006 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | SSR | XJ |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5324 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 400 HP |
Torque | 481 Nm | 561 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2150 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3170 mm |