2000 Chevrolet SSR vs. 2006 Toyota Sienna
To start off, 2006 Toyota Sienna is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet SSR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet SSR would be higher. At 5,324 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet SSR (300 HP) has 85 more horse power than 2006 Toyota Sienna. (215 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 2006 Toyota Sienna.
Because 2000 Chevrolet SSR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Chevrolet SSR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Sienna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet SSR (481 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Sienna. (301 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Sienna.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet SSR | 2006 Toyota Sienna | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | SSR | Sienna |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5324 cc | 3308 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 215 HP |
Torque | 481 Nm | 301 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1970 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3040 mm |