2000 Chevrolet SSR vs. 2010 SsangYong Chairman W
To start off, 2010 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet SSR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet SSR would be higher. At 5,324 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet SSR (300 HP) has 53 more horse power than 2010 SsangYong Chairman W. (247 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet SSR should accelerate faster than 2010 SsangYong Chairman W.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chevrolet SSR (481 Nm) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 SsangYong Chairman W. (343 Nm). This means 2000 Chevrolet SSR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 SsangYong Chairman W.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet SSR | 2010 SsangYong Chairman W | |
Make | Chevrolet | SsangYong |
Model | SSR | Chairman W |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5324 cc | 3598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 247 HP |
Torque | 481 Nm | 343 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 7-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1495 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2970 mm |