2000 Chevrolet SSR vs. 2011 BMW 750
To start off, 2011 BMW 750 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet SSR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet SSR would be higher. At 5,324 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 BMW 750 (400 HP) has 100 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet SSR. (300 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 BMW 750 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet SSR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet SSR weights approximately 45 kg more than 2011 BMW 750.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 BMW 750 (609 Nm) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet SSR. (481 Nm). This means 2011 BMW 750 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet SSR.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet SSR | 2011 BMW 750 | |
Make | Chevrolet | BMW |
Model | SSR | 750 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5324 cc | 4400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 400 HP |
Torque | 481 Nm | 609 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2150 kg | 2105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5215 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1902 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1481 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3211 mm |