2000 Chevrolet SSR vs. 2011 Ford F-350
To start off, 2011 Ford F-350 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet SSR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet SSR would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Ford F-350 (385 HP) has 85 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet SSR. (300 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet SSR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford F-350 (548 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet SSR. (481 Nm). This means 2011 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet SSR.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet SSR | 2011 Ford F-350 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | SSR | F-350 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5324 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 385 HP |
Torque | 481 Nm | 548 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3967 mm |