2000 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 1959 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 750 kg more than 1959 Chevrolet Impala.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1959 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chevrolet Suburban | 1959 Chevrolet Impala | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
| Model | Suburban | Impala |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5967 cc | 3851 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 9 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2390 kg | 1640 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2030 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3030 mm |
