2000 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 1963 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban (317 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 265 more horse power than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Suburban weights approximately 1460 kg more than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chevrolet Suburban | 1963 Volkswagen 1500 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volkswagen |
Model | Suburban | 1500 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2390 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5580 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 40 L |